The Tale of the Skyscraper of Human Consciousness

Imagine that human consciousness works exactly like a massive, luxurious residential tower. For this tower to light up and run efficiently, it needs two essential conditions that cannot work without each other:

Let's see what happens to this tower in each of our clinical tales:

1. Sleep: "Routine Maintenance"

In sleep, the tower is perfectly sound — there is no fault at all — but the tenants have decided to have a quiet night in.

What happens: the electrical board (the brainstem) deliberately dims the lights and manages the power differently, while the tenants (the cortex) lock the gates and disconnect from the outside world — yet they carry on with their own private activity inside the apartments.

Inside the building: during the dream phase, the tenants close the curtains and stop hearing what goes on in the street outside, but they are running their own private cinema indoors (dreams). And the advantage here? The moment a strong stimulus arrives (an alarm or a touch), the electrical board powers up to full capacity, the tenants throw open the doors, and the whole tower wakes up in a second!

2. Syncope (Fainting): "A Sudden Power Outage"

There is no structural damage here, but a sudden, rapid problem occurred in the "fuel supply pipes": blood and oxygen to the brain dropped abruptly for a few seconds.

What happens: the electrical board shuts down abruptly as a rapid act of self-protection, and consequently all the tenants of the tower fall into total darkness at the same instant.

Inside the building: for a moment the person feels the world spinning, and then — a completely "black screen": no dreams, no awareness of any kind. But as soon as the person falls flat on the ground, gravity helps the blood flow back immediately, the power comes back on, and the patient wakes up within seconds, bewildered: "What just happened? How did I end up sleeping here?"

3. Daydreaming: "The Tenants Ditched Work and Went to the Movies!"

Here there is no fault, no shock, and the generator never went off — the tower is at peak activity and its power is running at 100%!

What happens: the electrical board is fully lit (you are awake with your eyes open), but the tenants (the cortex) pull a very clever move: they hang a sign on the front door that reads "Do not disturb," and switch on a secret neural network called the Default Mode Network (DMN).

Inside the building: while you are zoned out in a lecture or on public transport, you disconnect sensorially from your immediate surroundings (you don't register the words precisely, you're not focused on the road), because the tenants inside are off on journeys through time — recalling memories, composing imaginary conversations, or planning the future. And the moment someone calls your name, the tenants throw open the windows and snap back to reality in a fraction of a second!

4. Coma: "A Major Failure in the Power Grid"

A coma is not an extra-deep sleep, as people tend to think. A coma means the tower has suffered "an accident or a violent blow" to its foundations, or "a chemical and metabolic poisoning" (from a stroke, a hemorrhage, or liver/kidney failure, for example).

What happens: the main electrical board (the brainstem) has broken down and been destroyed, or the apartments themselves (the cerebral cortex) have been extensively damaged on both sides. The result? The tower is in total darkness, the eyes are forcibly shut, and no matter how much you shout, knock, or even apply a painful stimulus, the tower will not respond — because the main wiring has been severed.

5. Wakefulness Without Awareness: "The Lights Are On… But Nobody's Home!"

This is one of the strangest medical conditions in the history of neuroscience, and it usually comes as the stage that follows a coma.

What happens: the electrical board (the brainstem) got repaired and switched itself back on, so the building's exterior lighting returned: the patient opens their eyes, and wakes and sleeps on a regular schedule! But the devastating twist? The apartments (the cerebral cortex) are still ruined and completely cut off.

Inside the building: the patient looks around with open eyes, but they do not see you, do not feel you, and are not even aware of their own existence. It is exactly like a computer whose monitor is on and showing (Online), while the "hard disk" holding all the data and programs is completely disconnected: full wakefulness… without a drop of awareness.

6. Minimally Conscious State: "A Weak, Glitchy Connection"

This is an excellent step and a real point of hope — far better than wakefulness without awareness, and considered the beginning of the road back.

What happens: some of the apartments have started running "bootleg wires" and reconnecting with the electrical board, but the connection is still weak, unstable, and keeps cutting out.

Inside the building: most of the time the patient is absent and unresponsive, but suddenly, in quick flashes, you may find them shedding a tear at the sound of their mother's voice in particular, or their eyes tracking you intently as you walk across the room, or smiling at an appropriate moment… and then they disconnect again, as if the signal dropped. There is awareness — but it flickers, and it is limited.

7. Brain Death: "The Total Collapse of the Tower"

Here the story has ended — medically, legally, and biologically.

What happens: the electrical board (the brainstem) and all the apartments with their tenants (the cortex) have died completely; their cells have necrosed and broken down after the blood supply stopped entirely and the brain swelled. The computer has shut down forever.

Inside the building: the artificial medical machines in intensive care are what pump oxygen into the lungs and keep the heart moving as a "separate pump" by force, but the brain itself has died completely, and its recording has become a "silent flat line." This is an absolutely irreversible state, because brain cells do not regenerate once they have entirely died.

The Greatest Mystery… Consciousness Behind Bars!

In recent years, scientists ran an experiment that overturned the scales of medicine. They took patients clinically diagnosed as being in a "vegetative state" (that is, a tower with the lights on and eyes open — but we assumed there were no tenants), placed them in advanced functional MRI scanners (fMRI), and told them verbally: "Imagine you are playing tennis," or "Imagine you are walking through your apartment."

And the astonishing surprise: the motor and spatial-navigation areas in these patients' brains lit up and worked in exactly the same way and pattern as they do in the brain of a fully awake, healthy person!
The scientific interpretation: this means that a proportion of these patients are inside the tower — hearing, living, and fully aware — but the tower itself has suffered a "complete motor paralysis" that leaves the patient unable to send any signal or movement to show us they are awake. This is what we call Covert Consciousness, and it is the reason human consciousness remains the greatest and deepest enigma science is still trying to decode to this day!
The Full Academic Paper + References The expanded research paper: definitions, neural mechanisms, comparison table, debates, and references — click to expand ▼
↓ Comparison Table ↓ References

1. Executive Summary

The study of human consciousness and its clinical alterations represents a critical intersection between cognitive neuroscience, critical care medicine, and the philosophy of mind. This paper aims to deconstruct the conceptual and clinical confusion surrounding the various states of altered consciousness: sleep, syncope, coma, wakefulness without awareness (Vegetative State), the Minimally Conscious State, and brain death, in addition to daydreaming (mind-wandering) as a unique pattern of altered consciousness during behavioral wakefulness.

Neurologically, consciousness is defined by two primary components: Arousal (Wakefulness), which depends on the Ascending Reticular Activating System (ARAS) in the brainstem, and Awareness (Perception), which depends on the cerebral cortex and its distributed interactive networks (Laureys, 2005).

Sleep is distinguished as a dynamic, reversible, neurally regulated state. Syncope, by contrast, represents an acute, transient deficit in cerebral blood perfusion that produces a sudden loss of both arousal and awareness, yet reverses rapidly once blood flow is restored. Coma results from extensive structural or metabolic injury to the cerebral cortex or brainstem, and may evolve into wakefulness without awareness (the vegetative state: wakefulness without perception), into the minimally conscious state (fluctuating, limited awareness), or end in brain death — the complete and irreversible absence of all brain functions. Conversely, daydreaming emerges as a natural physiological state during wakefulness in which the cerebral cortex sensorially decouples from external stimuli while maintaining elevated arousal and intense self-generated awareness, driven by the activity of the Default Mode Network (DMN) (Christoff et al., 2009).

2. Precise Definitions and Terminology

Sleep

A natural behavioral and biological state, periodic and reversible, characterized by reduced responsiveness to environmental stimuli, and governed by circadian regulation and homeostatic drive (Scammell et al., 2017). Established scientific consensus

Syncope (Fainting)

A transient and sudden loss of consciousness and postural tone, caused by an acute, temporary deficit in global cerebral blood perfusion (transient cerebral hypoperfusion), characterized by rapid onset, short duration, and spontaneous, complete recovery (Moya et al., 2009). Established scientific consensus

Transient Loss of Consciousness (TLOC)

A broad clinical umbrella encompassing any state in which a patient briefly loses consciousness, covering vascular causes (syncope), epileptic causes (seizures), and metabolic or concussive events (Wieling et al., 2009). Established scientific consensus

Coma

A state of profound, sustained unresponsiveness (typically lasting more than an hour), in which the patient lies with eyes closed and cannot be aroused by any verbal or painful stimuli, resulting from the simultaneous absence of both the "arousal" and "awareness" components (Posner et al., 2019). Established scientific consensus

Wakefulness Without Awareness — Vegetative State / Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome (UWS)

A clinical condition in which the patient appears awake (opening their eyes spontaneously, with the return of sleep–wake cycles), but shows no evidence of awareness of self or of the surrounding environment, and has no capacity for purposeful interaction with external stimuli (Multi-Society Task Force on PVS, 1994; Laureys et al., 2010). Established scientific consensus

Minimally Conscious State (MCS)

A condition of severely disordered consciousness in which minimal but definite, reproducible behavioral evidence of awareness of self or environment is demonstrated — such as visually tracking people's movement, or inconsistently following simple commands (Giacino et al., 2002). Established scientific consensus

Daydreaming / Mind-Wandering

A natural physiological state during wakefulness in which attention shifts away from external tasks and the immediate environment toward self-generated internal thoughts, feelings, and mental scenarios (Smallwood & Schooler, 2015). Established scientific consensus

Brain Death

The complete and final, irreversible loss of all brain functions, including the cerebral hemispheres and the brainstem; it is considered the legal and medical equivalent of the biological death of the person (Bernat, 2006). Established scientific consensus

3. Neurobiological Mechanisms

A. Sleep

Neural mechanism: sleep is regulated through a reciprocal interaction between the brainstem arousal system and the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). The ARAS is inhibited by the ventrolateral preoptic nucleus (VLPO) in the hypothalamus via the transmitters GABA and galanin (Scammell et al., 2017). Established scientific consensus

Cortical and brainstem activity: cortical activity decreases during the NREM stage, with the cortex and brainstem coordinating the regulation of slow waves, while the brainstem and cingulate cortex become active during the REM stage in a manner resembling wakefulness. Strong evidence

Blood flow and EEG patterns: cerebral blood flow (CBF) decreases by 20–30% in NREM. The EEG in stage N3 shows slow delta waves (<4 Hz), whereas the REM stage exhibits fast, low-voltage waves resembling wakefulness (Steriade et al., 1993). Established scientific consensus

B. Syncope

Neural mechanism: a rapid drop in systolic blood pressure below 60 mmHg, or interruption of blood flow to the brain for 6–8 seconds, causing an immediate failure of cellular energy within the consciousness network (Moya et al., 2009). Established scientific consensus

Cortical and brainstem activity: a sudden, global functional inhibition of the cerebral cortex occurs, while the brainstem may retain some basic vital reflexes briefly unless the hypoperfusion is prolonged. Strong evidence

Blood flow and EEG patterns: a sharp, dramatic drop in CBF. The EEG shows rapid slowing and the emergence of high-voltage delta waves, followed by a period of temporary electrical silence if the hypoperfusion lasts more than a few seconds (Ammirati et al., 2020). Strong evidence

C. Coma

Neural mechanism: severe bilateral dysfunction of the cerebral cortex, or direct structural damage to the Ascending Reticular Activating System (ARAS) in the upper brainstem (Posner et al., 2019). Established scientific consensus

Blood flow and EEG patterns: the metabolic rate and cerebral blood flow fall by more than 50%. The EEG shows abnormal patterns such as bilateral synchronous delta waves, the burst-suppression pattern, or the alpha-coma pattern that fails to react to stimuli (Young, 2000). Strong evidence

D. Wakefulness Without Awareness

Neural mechanism: preservation of brainstem functions (ARAS) with complete disconnection of the cerebral cortex, or widespread injury to the axonal white matter (Diffuse Axonal Injury) (Laureys et al., 2000). Strong evidence

Blood flow and EEG patterns: cortical metabolism falls to 40–50% of normal. The EEG shows severe, continuous generalized slowing (theta and delta waves), with a complete absence of recorded responses to complex cognitive stimuli. Strong evidence

E. Minimally Conscious State

Neural mechanism: partial and intermittent restoration of functional connectivity between the cortex and the thalamus (thalamocortical loops), allowing limited integration of sensory information (Giacino et al., 2002). Strong evidence

Blood flow and EEG patterns: PET scans show higher metabolism in primary cortical regions compared with wakefulness without awareness. The EEG fluctuates between slow patterns and near-normal patterns coinciding with attempts at interaction. Moderate evidence

F. Daydreaming

Neural mechanism: associated with intense activity of the Default Mode Network (DMN) together with partial inhibition of the externally directed task-attention network, producing a temporary sensory decoupling (Schooler et al., 2011). Strong evidence

Blood flow and EEG patterns: associated with an increase in alpha wave power (α: 8–12 Hz), particularly in posterior parietal regions, as an indicator of the suppression of external sensory processing to protect internal thoughts from disruption (Kam et al., 2011). Moderate evidence

G. Brain Death

Neural mechanism: widespread, irreversible tissue damage and cellular necrosis in the cells of the brain, medulla, and pons, resulting from elevated intracranial pressure and the complete cessation of perfusion (Bernat, 2006). Established scientific consensus

Blood flow and EEG patterns: cerebral blood flow ceases entirely (no-flow phenomenon). The EEG shows a completely silent, flat electrical line (isoelectric/flat EEG) recorded under strict protocols (Wijdicks et al., 2010). Established scientific consensus

4. Structured Clinical Comparison Table

State Arousal Self-Awareness Environmental Awareness Responsiveness Memory EEG Recovery Potential Immediate Risks
Normal Sleep Reversible & cyclic Partial & altered (dreams) Very low, reversible by stimuli Present (wakes to an alarm) Very weak except for dream flashes Cyclic: sleep spindles, slow waves, REM Certain and spontaneous, daily Obstructive sleep apnea (in pathological cases)
Syncope Temporarily lost Completely absent Completely absent Completely absent during the episode Absent (retrograde amnesia) Severe slowing (delta) then brief flattening Very high and spontaneous, within seconds Fall injuries, cardiac arrest
Coma Completely absent (eyes closed) Completely absent Completely absent Absent (except involuntary reflexes) Completely absent Continuous slow waves, burst-suppression, or alpha coma Depends on the cause (from recovery to death) Respiratory failure, cerebral edema, permanent neural damage
Vegetative State Present (sleep–wake cycles) Completely absent Completely absent Absent to purposeful stimuli, present as reflexes Completely absent Severe, continuous generalized slowing Low after one year (traumatic) or 3 months Bedsores, pneumonia, thrombosis
MCS Present (sleep–wake cycles) Partial & fluctuating Partial & fluctuating Inconsistent (visual tracking, appropriate crying) Absent to severely limited General slowing with periods of reactive activity Moderate to good Complications of chronic immobility, infections
Daydreaming Full and elevated High and intense Temporarily reduced Present instantly upon alerting High for internal thoughts Cortically enhanced alpha (α) waves Spontaneous and instant, at will Temporary inattention to hazards
Brain Death Irreversibly lost Irreversibly lost Irreversibly lost Completely absent (except spinal cord reflexes) Completely absent Total electrical silence (isoelectric/flat) Impossible — synonymous with death Complete collapse of glands and heart within days

5. Where Are We, Neurologically, During Each State?

Sleep: Transformed, Decoupled Consciousness

In the NREM stage, cortical integration declines and the Default Mode Network — responsible for self-referential thought — fragments (Horovitz et al., 2009). Strong evidence Yet consciousness does not vanish entirely; it transforms. In the REM stage, the visual, cingulate, and limbic cortices are reactivated while the prefrontal cortex is suppressed, which explains the vivid, illogical experience of dreams (Hobson et al., 2000). Strong evidence

Neuroscience demonstrates that we "exist" as internally conscious selves during sleep — but we are sensorially decoupled from the outside world.

Syncope: A Sudden Network Shutdown

In syncope, the patient suffers an immediate, rapid loss of awareness of self and surroundings. The higher cortical networks stop working due to the acute, hypoxia-induced collapse of ATP (Ammirati et al., 2020). Strong evidence

The subjective experience here is "nothing": a temporal gap the patient only perceives after regaining consciousness, and there is no evidence whatsoever of covert information processing during the moment of total electrical collapse.

Daydreaming: Self-Directed Cognitive Decoupling

Here, attention shifts entirely away from the external surroundings to focus on self-generated mental scenarios (mental simulation), proving that perception can operate at peak capacity while isolated from the environment, as long as the arousal system is functioning regularly (Smallwood & Schooler, 2015). Strong evidence

Coma and Its Prolonged Syndromes: The Enigma of Covert Processing

For many years, coma and wakefulness without awareness were considered a total absence of consciousness. However, pioneering studies using functional MRI showed that around 15–20% of patients diagnosed with wakefulness without awareness are able to imagine playing tennis or walking through their homes when asked verbally, producing activity in the supplementary motor area of the brain identical to that of healthy individuals (Cruse et al., 2011; Owen et al., 2006). Strong evidence

The open question: do these patients possess a connected experience of subjective awareness (subjective experience), or is it a complex, automatic, non-conscious form of information processing? This explanatory gap remains a philosophical and scientific frontier that has yet to be resolved (Chalmers, 1995).

6. Scientific Debates and Open Questions

The Clash of Theories: IIT versus GNWT

A wide-ranging debate continues between Integrated Information Theory (IIT), which holds that consciousness is an intrinsic property of a system, dependent on the degree of neural integration of its information (Tononi, 2004), and the Global Neuronal Workspace Theory (GNWT), which requires information to be broadcast to the fronto-parietal cortex in order to become conscious (Dehaene & Changeux, 2011). Ongoing scientific debate

Redefining Brain Death

Recent studies — such as the BrainEx system study, which restored perfusion to pig brains hours after death — have sparked ethical and medical debates about how settled cellular death really is after perfusion stops, and about what level of perception might be absent behind the conventional flat-line recording (Vrselja et al., 2019). Moderate evidence / ethical debate

7. Common Misconceptions

Confusing Sleep with Coma

It is popularly believed that a coma is merely a "very deep sleep." The scientific correction: this is structurally and functionally incorrect. Sleep is an active process, regulated hormonally and neurally, characterized by immediate reversibility upon stimulation and a dynamic, shifting wave architecture. A coma is a pathological state caused by structural failure or damage, characterized by rigid electrical activity and the complete absence of any arousal response. Established scientific consensus

Syncope as "Temporary Death"

It is commonly said that a person who faints "dies for a few seconds." The scientific correction: syncope is a biological protection mechanism. When blood pressure drops, the horizontal fall allows gravity to restore blood flow to the brain, saving the cells from damage; the brain cells remain alive and metabolic activity continues at a minimal level. Established scientific consensus

"Coma Patients Hear Everything"

The widespread belief that all coma patients perceive and hear what is happening around them. The scientific correction: in a true coma, damage to the ARAS network or the cerebral cortex prevents the perceptual processing of the senses. Hearing requires cortical integration that is completely disabled in acute coma. Covert awareness is detected only in specific proportions of minimally conscious states or chronic wakefulness-without-awareness cases (Giacino et al., 2002; Owen, 2013). Strong evidence

Consciousness Leaving the Body

Interpreting near-death experiences or severe syncope as the consciousness physically separating and hovering above the body. The scientific correction: neurological studies have shown that these experiences are perceptual disturbances caused by a failure to integrate sensory signals within the temporoparietal junction (TPJ), the region responsible for representing the body in space (Blanke et al., 2002). Strong evidence

8. Conclusion

Multidisciplinary analysis shows that consciousness is not a binary (on/off) state, but a complex networked system in which levels of arousal are distinct from levels of awareness. While sleep represents a healthy cyclical variation within this system, syncope reflects a transient vascular interruption, and coma and its syndromes express an acute functional or structural disintegration.

Modern neurotechnologies have enabled scientists to detect covert perceptual activity that was invisible to the naked clinical eye. Yet the puzzle of subjective, experiential consciousness remains one of the most exciting scientific horizons for the future — demanding continued research, and great caution in projecting philosophical conclusions onto clinical and biological data.

References

  1. Ammirati, F., Colaceci, R., De Seta, F., & Violi, F. (2020). Electroencephalographic changes during syncope. Europace, 22(7), 1010–1018.
  2. Bernat, J. L. (2006). The whole-brain concept of death remains sound. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 34(1), 35–43.
  3. Blanke, O., Ortigue, S., Landis, T., & Seeck, M. (2002). Stimulating illusory own-body perceptions. Nature, 419(6904), 269–270.
  4. Chalmers, D. J. (1995). Facing up to the problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 2(3), 200–219.
  5. Christoff, K., Gordon, A. M., Smallwood, J., Smith, R., & Schooler, J. W. (2009). Experience sampling during fMRI reveals default network and executive system contributions to mind wandering. PNAS, 106(21), 8719–8724.
  6. Cruse, D., et al. (2011). Bedside detection of awareness in the vegetative state. The Lancet, 378(9809), 2088–2094.
  7. Dehaene, S., & Changeux, J. P. (2011). Experimental and theoretical approaches to conscious processing. Neuron, 70(2), 200–227.
  8. Giacino, J. T., et al. (2002). The minimally conscious state: Definition and diagnostic criteria. Neurology, 58(3), 349–353.
  9. Hobson, J. A., Pace-Schott, E. F., & Stickgold, R. (2000). Dreaming and the brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(6), 793–842.
  10. Horovitz, S. G., et al. (2009). Decoupling of the brain's default mode network during deep sleep. PNAS, 106(27), 11376–11381.
  11. Kam, J. W. Y., et al. (2011). Slow fluctuations in attentional control of sensory cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(2), 460–470.
  12. Laureys, S. (2005). The neural correlate of (un)consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(12), 556–559.
  13. Laureys, S., et al. (2000). Restoration of thalamocortical connectivity after recovery from persistent vegetative state. The Lancet, 355(9217), 1790–1791.
  14. Laureys, S., et al. (2010). Unresponsive wakefulness syndrome. BMC Medicine, 8(1), 1–4.
  15. Moya, A., et al. (2009). Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope. European Heart Journal, 30(21), 2631–2671.
  16. Multi-Society Task Force on PVS. (1994). Medical aspects of the persistent vegetative state. NEJM, 330(21), 1499–1508.
  17. Owen, A. M. (2013). Detecting consciousness: A unique role for neuroimaging. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 109–133.
  18. Owen, A. M., et al. (2006). Detecting awareness in the vegetative state. Science, 313(5792), 1402.
  19. Posner, J. B., et al. (2019). Plum and Posner's Diagnosis and Treatment of Stupor and Coma (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
  20. Scammell, T. E., Arrigoni, E., & Lipton, J. O. (2017). Neural circuitry of wakefulness and sleep. Annals of Neurology, 82(2), 151–166.
  21. Schooler, J. W., Smallwood, J., Christoff, K., Handy, T. C., Reichle, E. D., & Sayette, M. A. (2011). Meta-awareness, perceptual decoupling and the wandering mind. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(7), 319–326.
  22. Smallwood, J., & Schooler, J. W. (2015). The science of mind wandering: Empirically navigating the stream of consciousness. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 487–518.
  23. Steriade, M., McCormick, D. A., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1993). Thalamocortical oscillations in the sleeping and aroused brain. Science, 262(5134), 679–685.
  24. Tononi, G. (2004). An information integration theory of consciousness. BMC Neuroscience, 5(1), 1–22.
  25. Vrselja, Z., et al. (2019). Restoration of brain circulation and cellular functions hours post-mortem. Nature, 568(7752), 336–343.
  26. Wieling, W., et al. (2009). Symptoms and signs of syncope. Brain, 132(10), 2630–2642.
  27. Wijdicks, E. F., et al. (2010). Evidence-based guideline update: Determining brain death in adults. Neurology, 74(23), 1911–1918.
  28. Young, G. B. (2000). EEG in coma. The American Journal of EEG Technology, 40(1), 29–45.